Personalization Use Cases
Personalized Retrieval
You can allow agents to fetch and rank the most relevant user-specific snippets from Fastino’s memory — enabling grounded reasoning, context continuity, and truly personal responses.
Using Fastino’s /chunks endpoint, agents can access top-k excerpts from user events and documents to support personalized chat, decision assistance, or proactive reasoning.
Overview
Personalized retrieval gives agents long-term memory recall — not just static summaries.
By retrieving specific, semantically relevant chunks of user data, agents can:
Reference prior conversations, notes, or emails directly.
Ground responses in authentic user context.
Build dynamic memory graphs across sessions and tools.
Avoid repeating questions or redundant suggestions.
This makes assistants contextually aware, coherent, and adaptive — across every interaction.
Key Components
Component | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
Chunk Store | Fastino’s internal memory of embedded user data. | “doc_7#p1 → Typical focus blocks 9–12 PT.” |
Semantic Retrieval | Top-k search using adaptive user embeddings. | Finds notes, decisions, or events relevant to the query. |
Context Fusion | Combines retrieved snippets with active conversation context. | Blends work style and recent meeting notes. |
RAG Interface | Returns excerpts for use in model prompts or reasoning. | Provides |
Example: Retrieving User Context for Grounding
Response
These retrieved snippets can then be fed directly into your model’s reasoning prompt.
Example: Prompt Grounding with Retrieved Snippets
This ensures the model’s response is grounded in authentic, user-specific information.
Example: Combining Retrieval with Summaries
Agents can combine retrieval results with deterministic summaries for hybrid reasoning:
By merging the high-level summary (“Ash prefers meetings after 1 PM”) with specific snippets, your agent gets both abstraction and precision.
Example: Retrieval in Multi-Agent Environments
Different agents (e.g., calendar, email, and planning assistants) can all use Fastino’s retrieval layer to share context:
Agent | Query | Retrieved Context |
|---|---|---|
Calendar Agent | “When does Ash prefer meetings?” | “Typical focus blocks 9–12 PT.” |
Email Agent | “How does Ash respond to scheduling changes?” | “Prefers async replies, concise updates.” |
Chat Agent | “What should I remind Ash about today?” | “Pending review of design sprint doc.” |
All agents read from the same memory base, ensuring cross-tool coherence.
Example Implementation (Python)
This returns the top-ranked user memory snippets for grounding.
Architecture
Retrieval and Grounding Flow
Each user’s memory is stored as vectorized chunks, indexed for fast semantic retrieval.
Example: Cross-Tool Retrieval
Since Fastino indexes all user data under the same user_id, retrieval can cross tool boundaries:
Response
This retrieves memory from Notion, Slack, and Gmail in one call.
Confidence Scoring and Deduplication
Each retrieved snippet includes a relevance score (0–1).
You can filter or rerank snippets by score threshold:
Fastino automatically deduplicates by chunk ID and source to ensure clean, non-redundant context.
Combining Retrieval with Reasoning
Use Fastino’s retrieved context as structured input for any reasoning model or chain:
Step | Action | Endpoint |
|---|---|---|
1 | Retrieve user snippets |
|
2 | Summarize or compress |
|
3 | Feed to reasoning model | Your agent / LLM context |
4 | Log new insights |
|
This enables iterative, context-aware reasoning loops that stay grounded over time.
Integration with Other Use Cases
Related Use Case | Description |
|---|---|
Cross-tool Reasoning | Retrieve unified context across multiple tools. |
Context Handoff | Transfer relevant snippets between devices or sessions. |
Proactive Alignment | Fetch relevant data before proactive actions. |
Decision Prediction | Retrieve past choices to guide new recommendations. |
Use Cases
Use Case | Description |
|---|---|
Conversational Agents | Retrieve relevant user memories to ground replies. |
Knowledge Assistants | Fetch context-specific notes and documents. |
Scheduling Systems | Retrieve historical meeting and routine data. |
RAG-Powered Copilots | Combine Fastino retrieval with model reasoning pipelines. |
Adaptive Writing Agents | Reference prior tone, phrasing, or writing samples dynamically. |
Best Practices
Always specify
top_k(default: 5) for optimal precision.Cache results briefly in session memory for speed.
Filter by source or content type if needed (
options.source_filter).Pair retrieval with deterministic summaries for grounding.
Use feedback ingestion to refine embedding accuracy over time.
Never expose raw chunk IDs — treat as internal references.
Example: Deterministic Retrieval Summary
Response
This provides a lightweight overview before performing a full retrieval operation.
Summary
The Personalized Retrieval use case gives your agents true user-level memory recall, enabling them to ground reasoning and output in authentic, contextual data.
By combining vectorized retrieval (/chunks) with deterministic summaries (/summary), Fastino turns every assistant into a personalized, contextually aware reasoning system — grounded, adaptive, and continuously learning.
Next, continue to Personalization Use Cases → Knowledge Graph Reasoning to explore how Fastino connects relationships and reasoning paths across user data.
Join our Discord Community